> compare_mode
Google Chronicle vs Microsoft Security Copilot
Side-by-side comparison of Google Chronicle and Microsoft Security Copilot. See how they stack up in pricing, features, and real-world use cases.
Google Chronicle
by Google Cloud · Mountain View, CA
SIEM & SOC Platform
Enterprise — from Contact Sales
- Fixed-price ingestion fundamentally changes the economics of security data collection — ingest everything, decide later what matters
- Google infrastructure delivers query performance on petabyte-scale datasets that traditional SIEM architectures cannot match
- Mandiant integration provides elite threat intelligence and incident response expertise directly within the platform
- Ecosystem maturity and community content lag behind Splunk's 15+ years of app marketplace development
- Organizations with existing Splunk expertise face SPL-to-YARA-L migration effort and analyst retraining
- Compliance-heavy industries may find reporting and audit capabilities less developed than established SIEM platforms
- 01 Centralizing all security telemetry into a single platform without data volume trade-offs or ingestion cost anxiety
- 02 Deploying Mandiant-maintained curated detections for immediate coverage against emerging threats
- 03 Conducting retroactive threat hunts across 12+ months of petabyte-scale data with sub-second query performance
- 04 Using Gemini for Security to investigate incidents and generate detection rules in natural language
- 05 Replacing per-GB SIEM pricing models that force security teams to drop critical data sources
Google Chronicle solves the single biggest problem in SIEM: the cost of data. By eliminating per-GB ingestion pricing, Chronicle enables security teams to collect every data source without compromise and search across it at Google speed. For organizations drowning in Splunk costs or starting a fresh SIEM deployment, Chronicle offers a compelling cloud-native alternative backed by Mandiant's threat intelligence expertise.
Microsoft Security Copilot
by Microsoft · Redmond, WA
AI Security Assistant
Enterprise — from $4/SCU/hour
- Microsoft's 78 trillion daily signals provide threat context that no other vendor can match at that scale
- Incident summarization alone saves hours per incident and improves consistency of reporting
- Integrated natively across the Microsoft security stack, eliminating context switching between Sentinel, Defender, and Entra
- Consumption-based SCU pricing makes cost forecasting difficult and can create budget surprises during incident surges
- Organizations running non-Microsoft SIEM and EDR tools get significantly less value from the integration
- AI assistant model means it augments analysts rather than automating workflows — does not replace SOAR or automated response tools
- 01 Accelerating incident investigation by querying security data across Microsoft Defender and Sentinel in natural language
- 02 Generating executive-ready incident summaries that include timeline, impact assessment, and remediation steps
- 03 Analyzing obfuscated scripts and suspicious code samples with AI-powered reverse engineering explanations
- 04 Training and upskilling junior SOC analysts with AI-guided investigation workflows
- 05 Building threat hunting queries without requiring deep KQL expertise
Microsoft Security Copilot is the most promising AI security assistant for organizations invested in the Microsoft security ecosystem. Its natural language investigation, incident summarization, and script analysis capabilities genuinely accelerate SOC workflows. The SCU pricing model requires careful management, and non-Microsoft shops should evaluate alternatives. It augments analysts rather than replacing tools — plan to use it alongside, not instead of, your SIEM and EDR platforms.